On Monday, Fb and its subsidiaries Instagram and WhatsApp went darkish after a router failure. There have been hundreds of adverse headlines, thousands and thousands of complaints, and greater than 3 billion customers have been pressured offline. On Tuesday, the corporate’s week obtained considerably worse.
Frances Haugen, a former product supervisor with Fb, testified earlier than US senators about what she had seen in her two years there – and set out why she had determined to leak a trove of inner paperwork to the Wall Avenue Journal. Haugen had revealed herself because the supply of the leak just a few days earlier. And whereas the content material of the leak – from inner warnings of the hurt being achieved to youngsters by Instagram to the deal Fb offers celebrities to depart their content material unmoderated – had already led to debate about whether or not the corporate wanted to reform, Haugen’s choice to come back ahead escalated the stress on Mark Zuckerberg.
On this episode, Nosheeen Iqbal talks to the Guardian’s international expertise editor, Dan Milmo, about what we discovered from Haugen’s testimony, and the way damaging per week this might be for Fb. Milmo units out the challenges going through the corporate because it seeks to argue that the whistleblower is poorly knowledgeable or that her criticism is mistaken. And he displays on what choices politicians and regulators around the globe will take into account as they search for methods to curb Fb’s energy, and the way possible such strikes are to succeed.
After Haugen spoke, Zuckerberg mentioned her claims that the corporate places revenue over individuals’s security have been “simply not true”. In a weblog publish, he added: “The argument that we intentionally push content material that makes individuals offended for revenue is deeply illogical. We generate income from adverts, and advertisers persistently inform us they don’t need their adverts subsequent to dangerous or offended content material.” You may learn extra of Zuckerberg’s defence right here. And you’ll learn an evaluation of how Haugen’s testimony is prone to have an effect on Congress’s subsequent transfer right here.
Archive: BBC; YouTube; TikTok; CSPAN; NBC; CBS;CNBC; Vice; CNN
Help The Guardian
The Guardian is editorially unbiased.
And we wish to maintain our journalism open and accessible to all.
However we more and more want our readers to fund our work.